Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > We are at a level where we still see ABI breakage in upgrades for FE5 or > FE6. Usually, the spec changelog says nothing else than "Update to 2.x", > and only afterwards, the reported breakage is cleaned up with rebuilds. > No comment on whether the ABI breakage was expected or not. If breakage > was expected, I would hope for at least a warning the in spec changelog. > And that would increase trust in the packager. If breakage was expected, a responsible developer would /not/ push the package out, so this is completely moot. [...] > What is so difficult about requesting packagers to be more verbose in > spec changelog comments _and_ reviews? It is not bureaucracy where you > depend on somebody else's decision. You just document "your stuff" and > be done. Well said. Too much %changelogs are way too laconic. If a version update, please add a reference to the (upstream, WWW) changelog. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
