On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 16:08 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote: > On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 03:42:41PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > According to the reviewing guidelines: > > - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. > > libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must > > go in a -devel package. > > > > But I doubt this doesn't make much sense for symlinks, does it? > If something dlopens the library, then .so files are needed, In this generality such a statement is not correct. Which files a dlopen opens is an implementation detail of application/library conventions and diverges largely between packages. It sometimes the files being dlopened are named "*.so", but not always. Theoretically it can be any name. Good designs don't use '*.so'. Ralf -- fedora-extras-list mailing list fedora-extras-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
