IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-dtls-srtp-framework (Frameworkfor Establishing an SRTP Security Context using DTLS) to ProposedStandard
- RE: tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02.txt
- Call for IAOC Nominations and Volunteers
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specifications
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specifications
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specification
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specification
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specifications
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specifications
- Re: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards &Specifications
- Fw: Unicode.org Software Internationalisation Standards & Specifications
- Re: WG Review: Low Extra Delay Background Transport (ledbat)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art review of draft-ietf-rmt-bb-fec-basic-schemes-revised-05
- RE: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-dtls-srtp-framework (Frameworkfor Establishing an SRTP Security Context using DTLS) to ProposedStandard
- Re: WG Review: Low Extra Delay Background Transport (ledbat)
- Re: WG Review: Low Extra Delay Background Transport (ledbat)
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- IETF Trust Decision on "Legal Provisions for IETF Documents" (dated October 16, 2008)
- tsv-dir review of draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02.txt
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- From: Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- Re: Hey my local ISP has IPv6 connection!
- Re: Effect of the IPR mandates
- draft-hoffman-dac-vbr-04
- Re: [Sip] Last Call: draft-ietf-sip-dtls-srtp-framework (Framework for Establishing an SRTP Security Context using DTLS) to Proposed Standard
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- From: Bhatia, Manav (Manav)
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isis-hmac-sha-05
- Re: Hey my local ISP has IPv6 connection!
- Re: Hey my local ISP has IPv6 connection!
- Hey my local ISP has IPv6 connection!
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- RE: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- RE: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- RE: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- RE: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- RE: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- Re: Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- Re: a modern-day SNMP use
- Re: [dhcwg] LastCall:draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery(DHCPv6Bulk Leasequery)toProposed Standard
- Re: [dhcwg] LastCall:draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery(DHCPv6Bulk Leasequery)toProposed Standard
- Re: a modern-day SNMP use
- Re: a modern-day SNMP use
- a modern-day SNMP use
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- Re: placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- placing a dollar value on IETF IP.
- Gen-ART Review on draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation-09
- Re: [dhcwg] Last Call:draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery(DHCPv6Bulk Leasequery) toProposed Standard
- Review of draft-ietf-sipping-policy-package-05
- Review of draft-ietf-sip-hitchhikers-guide-05
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [dhcwg] Last Call:draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery(DHCPv6Bulk Leasequery) toProposed Standard
- Re: [TLS] Fwd: Last Call: draft-rescorla-tls-suiteb (Suite B Cipher Suites for TLS) to Informational RFC
- Re: [dhcwg] Last Call:draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery(DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery) toProposed Standard
- Re: [dhcwg] Last Call:draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery(DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery) toProposed Standard
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery(DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery) to Proposed Standard
- The cost of a RFC (Was: Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- Re: Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery(DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- RE: WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery (DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [secdir] Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [secdir] Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- Re: Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- Re: [secdir] Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery (DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- Re: [secdir] Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Publication track for IBE documents (Was Second Last Call...)
- Re: [secdir] Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: [secdir] Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Call for Comments: On RFC Streams, Headers, and Boilerplates
- Re: Last Call: draft-housley-iesg-rfc3932bis (IESG Procedures for Handling of Independent and IRTF Stream Submissions) to BCP
- Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery (DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [secdir] Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Second Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms (Using the Boneh-Franklin and Boneh-Boyen identity-based Encryption Algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Openness for IETF-sponsored events
- last call on draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms and draft-ietf-smime-ibearch
- Re: Second Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms (Using the Boneh-Franklin and Boneh-Boyen identity-based Encryption Algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-bulk-leasequery (DHCPv6 Bulk Leasequery) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Second Last Call: draft-ietf-smime-bfibecms (Using the Boneh-Franklin and Boneh-Boyen identity-based Encryption Algorithms with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)) to Proposed Standard
- Openness for IETF-sponsored events
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Workshop on ROADM, Part of Globecom 2008
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: Last Call: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf (ImprovedExtensible AuthenticationProtocol Method for 3rd Generation Authentication and KeyAgreement (EAP-AKA')) to Informational RFC
- From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf (ImprovedExtensible AuthenticationProtocol Method for 3rd Generation Authentication and KeyAgreement (EAP-AKA')) to Informational RFC
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: Last Call: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf (ImprovedExtensible AuthenticationProtocol Method for 3rd Generation Authentication and KeyAgreement (EAP-AKA')) to Informational RFC
- From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf (Improved Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for 3rd Generation Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA')) to Informational RFC
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pce-path-key-03
- Re: NTIA request for feedback on DNSSEC deployment at the root zone
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pce-path-key-03
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pce-path-key-03
- Re: NTIA request for feedback on DNSSEC deployment at the root zone
- Re: Old IETF Articles on Google News
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Old IETF Articles on Google News
- Gen-art review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05.txt
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf (Improved Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for 3rd Generation Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA')) to Informational RFC
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: Last Call: draft-arkko-eap-aka-kdf (Improved Extensible Authentication Protocol Method for 3rd Generation Authentication and Key Agreement (EAP-AKA')) to Informational RFC
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-sip-media-security-requirements-07
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience (Measures for making DNS more resilient against forged answers) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience (Measures for making DNS more resilient against forged answers) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- From: Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: NTIA request for feedback on DNSSEC deployment at the root zone
- Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: NTIA request for feedback on DNSSEC deployment at the root zone
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: NTIA request for feedback on DNSSEC deployment at the root zone
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- RE: WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
- Re: NTIA request for feedback on DNSSEC deployment at the root zone
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience (Measures for making DNS more resilient against forged answers) to Proposed Standard
- From: Ólafur Guðmundsson /DNSEXT chair
- Re: NTIA request for feedback on DNSSEC deployment at the root zone
- Re: NTIA request for feedback on DNSSEC deployment at the root zone
- NTIA request for feedback on DNSSEC deployment at the root zone
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 in last call?
- Re: draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 in last call?
- draft-ietf-dkim-ssp-06 in last call?
- RE: [MMUSIC] Last Call: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation(SDP Capability Negotiation) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [MMUSIC] Last Call: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation(SDP Capability Negotiation) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [MMUSIC] Last Call: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-capability-negotiation (SDP Capability Negotiation) to Proposed Standard
- From: Ingemar Johansson S
- RE: draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt
- NomCom IAOC position (Was:Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees))
- From: Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt
- Re: draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt
- draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-03.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-behave-dccp (Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements for DCCP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
- Re: Call for Comments: Principles of Internet Host Configuration
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
- From: Rémi Denis-Courmont
- Re: RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
- RFC 2141 - URN Syntax
- Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-bryant-mpls-tp-jwt-report-00
- Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-forgery-resilience (Measures for making DNS more resilient against forged answers) to Proposed Standard
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: Fw: Proposal for .gb (great britain) suffix & alteration of the kalphabet in .uk
- The IETF policy needs to be expanded for two types of IPR Declarations.
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp - DTLS-SRTP to Proposed Standard
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Last Call: draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp - DTLS-SRTP to Proposed Standard
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: RFC 2026 interpretation question
- RFC 2026 interpretation question
- Re: creating a SCADA WG
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-05
- creating a SCADA WG
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Re: Fw: Proposal for .gb (great britain) suffix & alteration of the k alphabet in .uk
- Re: Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Secdir Review of draft-stjohns-sipso-05
- Fw: Proposal for .gb (great britain) suffix & alteration of the k alphabet in .uk
- New list: RECIPE (Reducing Energy Consumption with Internet Protocols Exploration)
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: I-D Action:draft-rfc-image-files-01.txt
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hoffman-utf8-rfcs-02.txt
- RE: I-D Action:draft-rfc-image-files-01.txt
- RE: Late Last Call Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rfc4749-dtx-update-01
- RE: Late Last Call Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rfc4749-dtx-update-01
- RE: I-D Action:draft-rfc-image-files-01.txt
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro (Netnews Architecture and Protocols) to Proposed Standard
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro (Netnews Architecture and Protocols) to Proposed Standard
- Proposed change to Granting of Rights Section of PCB78
- Re: FW: IETF copying conditions
- Re: draft-crocker-rfc-media-00.txt (was: Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal)
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro (Netnews Architecture and Protocols) to Proposed Standard
- Re: draft-crocker-rfc-media-00.txt (was: Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal)
- IETF mail-lists outbound server being exploited
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- draft-crocker-rfc-media-00.txt (was: Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal)
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro (Netnews Architecture and Protocols) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- RE: Late Last Call Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rfc4749-dtx-update-01
- RE: Late Last Call Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rfc4749-dtx-update-01
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Late Last Call Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rfc4749-dtx-update-01
- Re: Dublin proceedings
- Re: Dublin proceedings
- Re: Dublin proceedings
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sip-xcapevent-03
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro (Netnews Architecture and Protocols) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-psamp-info (Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports) to Proposed Standard
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Dublin proceedings
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Last Call for comments on "IETF Trust Legal Provisions" (dated 09-19-08)
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Late Last Call Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-rfc4749-dtx-update-01
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- RE: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: ROHC v1 and its problems
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: IETF copying conditions
- ROHC v1 and its problems
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sip-xcapevent-03
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- RE: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- RE: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- RE: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: SECDIR review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14
- SECDIR review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14
- Re: Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Call for review of proposed IESG Statement on Examples
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- RE: IETF copying conditions
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt
- Nomcom nominations not encrypted and e-mailed back in clear text
- Re: IETF copying conditions
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- RE: FW: IETF copying conditions
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Fwd: Call for discussion ofdraft-dawkins-nomcom-3777-issues-00
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: IETF Chair / IESG Chair / General Area nomination
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: Incumbent conflict of interest
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- RE: Incumbent conflict of interest
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- jodell2@xxxxxxx is no longer with CSC
- Re: Incumbent conflict of interest
- RE: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- IETF Chair / IESG Chair / General Area nomination
- Incumbent conflict of interest
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Application Area nominations (Was: On being public)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: When will the actual NOMCOM questionnaire come out?
- When will the actual NOMCOM questionnaire come out?
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: LastCall: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve EmailFiltering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- RE: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Re: On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- On being public (Was: Call for Nominees)
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Strong Opposition due to spam backscatter. Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07 and -08 (Sieve Email Filtering: Reject and Extended Reject Extensions) to Proposed Standard
- Re: The RFC Editor and the Internet Standards Process
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Encoding of extention marker
- Re: [rfc-i] The RFC Editor and the Internet Standards Process
- The RFC Editor and the Internet Standards Process
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Request for review and consensus -- draft-hartman-webauth-phishing
- Re: Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: Request for review and consensus -- draft-hartman-webauth-phishing
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-forces-mib (ForCES MIB) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF.org does its part on internationalization
- RE: IETF.org does its part on internationalization
- Re: IETF.org does its part on internationalization
- IETF.org does its part on internationalization
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-usefor-usepro (Netnews Architecture and Protocols) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14.txt
- Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14.txt
- Test, please ignore
- Update on the Mail List Issue
- Gen-art review of draft-ietf-forces-model-14.txt
- Fw: not the Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- IETF Mailing List Issue
- Re: not the Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: not the Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Last Call: RFC2183 to obsolete RFC1806
- Re: Chrome and NoteWell?
- Chrome and NoteWell?
- Re: not the Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Re: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Re: IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- IESG Statement on Revised guidance for interim meetings
- Unicode.org, ICANN.org & IETF.org
- Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-mib-07
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- displinary process issues...
- Re: Proposed Experiment: More Meeting Time on Friday for IETF 73
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Question regarding domain name in a web URL
- Question regarding domain name in a web URL
- From: darshan . karandikar
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: addition of IPR FIlings Link on WG Web Pages
- addition of IPR FIlings Link on WG Web Pages
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- IETF72, IPv6 Panel Report
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Publishing RFCs in PDF Formal
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- I18n of I-Ds (was Simpler than...)
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Simpler than draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- RE: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Re: draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- draft-rfc-image-files-00.txt
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-soft-errors-08.txt
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: 73rd IETF - Registration
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Re: Archives for closed WGs
- Archives for closed WGs
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Minneapolis IETF Code Sprint
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Strong Opposition due to spam blowback issues - Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Removal of nonsensical IETF patent disclosures
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: BCP or RFC references
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- Flame on random process documents (was: Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6)
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard
- Re: new text for ID_Checklist sect 3, item 6
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- authorizing subsequent use of contributions
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: BCP or RFC references
- Re: Last Call: draft-manner-router-alert-iana (IANA Considerations for the IPv4 and IPv6 Router Alert Option) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call for Comments on " Legal Provisions Related to IETFDocuments"
- Re: BCP or RFC references
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- From: Powers Chuck-RXCP20
- RE: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
- Re: Removal of IETF patent disclosures?
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]