Re: where to have the NAT66 discussion (was Re: [BEHAVE] Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Behave@xxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: where to have the NAT66 discussion (was Re: [BEHAVE] Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... )
From: jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Noel Chiappa)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 12:41:01 -0500 (EST)
Cc: jnc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    > From: Dan York <dyork@xxxxxxxxx>

    >  it's simple and easy and **that's what they know**

Not to mention that nobody ever got fired for deploying NAT...

	Noel
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Prev by Date: Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impactto applicationdevelopers
Next by Date: Re: [BEHAVE] Handwaving? [Re: where to have the NAT66 discussion (was Re: Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... )]
Previous by thread: EMM State
Next by thread: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-korhonen-mip4-service-06
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]