Re: Friday experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Saturday, 06 December, 2008 17:53 -0700 Cullen Jennings
<fluffy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> On Nov 29, 2008, at 5:15 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> I think it would be good to finally enforce the rules for
>> agenda   submissions. For instance, if no agenda for a
>> meeting is published   in time, the meeting shouldn't take
>> place.
> 
> +1
> 
> But in practice, every time something is late, an exception is
> made for it.

While I would favor more enforcement of those rules, I'm not
personally convinced that this is enough of a problem by itself
and fixing it would make a lot of difference.

However, in practice, late agendas are either a problem or they
are not a problem.  If they are not a problem, we should stop
pretending that they are.  If they are a problem, then the AD
granting the exception, or the entire IESG, should be held
accountable by the community for encouraging the problems to
occur.  

We really can't have it both ways, and neither can the WGs or
the IESG.

     john

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]