Dear Das, See inline. From:
p2psip-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:p2psip-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Das, Saumitra Dear Song, Processing power would be more
informational in terms of CPU load. A good example of what would be useful
would be to look at the comon monitoring tool
(http://summer.cs.princeton.edu/status/) for the planetlab testbed. It uses the
following metrics for selecting nodes based on CPU and I have found such
selection to be very useful in determining the performance of a slice on the
machine. [Song] It is also useful
in selecting peer for a neighbor table entry, when there are multiple choices existing
and for the overlay management to collect the overall status of the overlay. From the comon site, these are some metrics that may
be useful “CPU Speed We could define these fields and leave it optional as
to whether all of them are required. i.e. running a spin-loop may be expensive
for some devices. [Song] This is helpful. I’m
very glad to see this monitoring tool in the planetlab testbed. If it works
well in the planet lab, we may have it included in the diagnostics draft after
discussion. I also see other useful metrics for other parameters in the page (http://summer.cs.princeton.edu/status/). Best, Saumitra www.saumitra.info Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:12:21 +0800 From: Song Haibin <melodysong@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [P2PSIP] How to describe the processing power To: p2psip@xxxxxxxx Message-ID:
<003e01c943cc$d6e2b1a0$0c0ca40a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear all, In p2psip diagnostics draft http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zheng-p2psip-diagnose-03.txt , we have some doubt about how to describe one of the
diagnostic information: processing power. We propose to use the
unit of MIPS to describe it. However, the Max number of connections may be
another choice. Do you have any good suggestions? Best Regards, Song Haibin Email: melodysong@xxxxxxxxxx Skype: alexsonghw |
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf