Song Haibin, Your response " It is also
useful in selecting peer for a neighbor table entry, when there are multiple
choices existing and for the overlay management to collect the overall status
of the overlay." does also address Bruce question. My view is that the
pure CPU power or CPU current usage are good but the question is if they are
relevant for the decision since the user may limit the amount of resources it
wants to allocate for the p2p application. This may be based on percentage from
the link or number of connections. Roni Even From:
p2psip-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:p2psip-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Song
Haibin Dear Das, See inline. From:
p2psip-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:p2psip-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Das,
Saumitra Dear Song, Processing power would be more informational
in terms of CPU load. A good example of what would be useful would be to look
at the comon monitoring tool (http://summer.cs.princeton.edu/status/) for the
planetlab testbed. It uses the following metrics for selecting nodes based on
CPU and I have found such selection to be very useful in determining the
performance of a slice on the machine. [Song] It is also useful in selecting peer for a neighbor table
entry, when there are multiple choices existing and for the overlay management
to collect the overall status of the overlay. From the comon site, these are some metrics that may be
useful “CPU Speed We could define these fields and leave it optional as to
whether all of them are required. i.e. running a spin-loop may be expensive for
some devices. [Song] This is helpful. I’m very glad to see this monitoring tool
in the planetlab testbed. If it works well in the planet lab, we may have it
included in the diagnostics draft after discussion. I also see other useful
metrics for other parameters in the page (http://summer.cs.princeton.edu/status/). Best, Saumitra www.saumitra.info Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:12:21 +0800 From: Song Haibin <melodysong@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [P2PSIP] How to describe the processing power To: p2psip@xxxxxxxx Message-ID:
<003e01c943cc$d6e2b1a0$0c0ca40a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Dear all, In p2psip diagnostics draft http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zheng-p2psip-diagnose-03.txt , we have some doubt about how to describe one of the
diagnostic information: processing power. We propose to use the unit
of MIPS to describe it. However, the Max number of connections may be another
choice. Do you have any good suggestions? Best Regards, Song Haibin Email: melodysong@xxxxxxxxxx Skype: alexsonghw |
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf