Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Andrew Sullivan schrieb:

> As I noted (with Olafur) in our posting the other day, the problem _I_
> have with DNSBLs is that they're doing fairly serious damage to the
> DNS protocol.  That's a fact of life given the deployed software, but
> I don't think it's a good thing.

Can you please explain what this "fairly serious damage to the DNS
protocol" is?

-- Matthias
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]