Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 07:25:32PM +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Can you please explain what this "fairly serious damage to the DNS
> protocol" is?

The message I posted from Olafur and me the other day is supposed to
explain this already:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg53776.html

For the impatient, one fundamental problem is that the current
behaviour uses A records that do not contain host addresses, which is
contrary to the definition of an A record.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Shinkuro, Inc.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]