Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Matthias Leisi <matthias@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Sullivan schrieb:
>
>> As I noted (with Olafur) in our posting the other day, the problem _I_
>> have with DNSBLs is that they're doing fairly serious damage to the
>> DNS protocol.  That's a fact of life given the deployed software, but
>> I don't think it's a good thing.
>
> Can you please explain what this "fairly serious damage to the DNS
> protocol" is?

I would also like to better understand this concern.

Regards,
Al

-- 
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com   --   Chicago, IL, USA
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]