Al Iverson wrote:
I think anonymous may be a bit better in this context, because otherwise the conversation degenerates into an argument about some particular DNSBL, instead of a discussion about DNSBLs in general. I think a lot of us had a pretty good idea which DNSBL is usually the one in question when people are complaining....
The difficulty is that the current line of argument is that because some DNSBLs are operated badly, DNSBLs are bad.
For any interesting capability, there will always be some bad actors using it. So the argument that, therefore, the capability is unworthy of standardization is problematic.
d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf