Andrew Sullivan schrieb: > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg53776.html > > For the impatient, one fundamental problem is that the current > behaviour uses A records that do not contain host addresses, which is > contrary to the definition of an A record. And this counts as "fairly serious damage to the DNS protocol"? This seems like a *tiny* bit exaggerated. The suggestion to use a dedicated RRTYPE is nice, but many others have failed in this endeavour before. -- Matthias _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf