At 11:04 AM -0800 11/13/08, Matthias Leisi wrote: >The suggestion to use a dedicated RRTYPE is nice, but many others have >failed in this endeavour before. > >-- Matthias What do you mean "failed in this endeavour"? failed to get an RR assigned, or failed in deployment? regards, Ted _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf