Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:59 PM,  <michael.dillon@xxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks, appreciate the insight.

>> > This still breaks deliverability.
>>
>> How?
>
> A user writes an email and sends it to another user. The other user does
> not receive the email. This means that deliverability is broken. The
> DNSBL is an agent in preventing that delivery.

Is this unique to DNSBLs? If not, then why does it merit deeper
consideration in the context of DNSBLs?

Regards,
Al Iverson

-- 
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com   --   Chicago, IL, USA
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]