Al Iverson wrote: > Is this unique to DNSBLs? If not, then why does it merit deeper > consideration in the context of DNSBLs? what you are arguing is that rather than trying to address the harm done by DNSBLs, IETF should ignore that harm by ruling it out of scope for the current discussion. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf