RE: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > A user writes an email and sends it to another user. The other user 
> > does not receive the email. This means that deliverability 
> is broken. 
> > The DNSBL is an agent in preventing that delivery.
> 
> Is this unique to DNSBLs? If not, then why does it merit 
> deeper consideration in the context of DNSBLs?

Because the draft
<http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-07.txt>
that started this discussion has set the context of DNSBLs.
You are right that it also merits deeper consideration in other
contexts.

--Michael Dillon
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]