Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, IETF misinformation (was: several messages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:01 PM, Keith Moore <moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Al Iverson wrote:
>
>> Is this unique to DNSBLs? If not, then why does it merit deeper
>> consideration in the context of DNSBLs?
>
> what you are arguing is that rather than trying to address the harm done
> by DNSBLs, IETF should ignore that harm by ruling it out of scope for
> the current discussion.

I suggested no such thing. I asked for the opposite -- help somebody
who doesn't get it understand exactly what the connection is.

Regards,
Al Iverson


-- 
Al Iverson on Spam and Deliverability, see http://www.spamresource.com
News, stats, info, and commentary on blacklists: http://www.dnsbl.com
My personal website: http://www.aliverson.com   --   Chicago, IL, USA
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]