Re: uncooperative DNSBLs, was several messages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, John C Klensin wrote:
>
> If there were a BCP on the table that would permit us to talk
> about DNSRBLs that conform and those that don't, rather than
> about subjective opinions of "behaving badly", we would, IMO, be
> having a rather different discussion.

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-irtf-asrg-bcp-blacklists-04.txt

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
ROCKALL MALIN HEBRIDES: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7, INCREASING 7 OR GALE 8, PERHAPS
SEVERE GALE 9 LATER. ROUGH OR VERY ROUGH. RAIN, FOG PATCHES. MODERATE OR GOOD,
OCCASIONALLY VERY POOR.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]