Magnus Westerlund wrote: > ... > Tony, > > We had quite some discussion in IESG about where to discuss this topic. > There is no perfect fit. I think it is time to move it from Behave to > its own list as the discussion continues to go on and impacts Behave's > chartered work. However, the issues as you say is that it is an > architectural discussion and it affects all layers from routing up to > application. Which means that we need insights from all layers. But, we > can't continue to have a good discussion by cross posting to all area > list or the ietf@xxxxxxxx list. > > Also be certain that we haven't decided anything about what to do with > NAT66, except saying that we are allowing the discussion. There will be > a BOF before anything if any is chartered on this topic. > I look forward to the announcement about the new list. Tony _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf