Re: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> BGP is not a secure protocol.
>  
> We may work out a way to make BGP somewhat more secure, but most likely
> to defend against attacks such as flooding and DDoS rather than
> impersonation of end entities.
>  
> So why do you think it is appropriate for end user applications to make
> assumptions about end entity identity on the basis of source IP address?

I don't.  But the mapping service still need to be secure to thwart DoS
attacks.  (and it's a lot easier to get away with DoS attacks if you can
make them surgical - i.e. if you can make them apply only to a very
limited target without effecting anyone else)

Keith
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]