Re: Proposed DNSSEC Plenary Experiment for IETF 74

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As I remember it, the flood in the NOC was much more exciting then
the DNSSEC bits.

- Lucy

On Nov 27, 2008, at 8:49 PM, Matthew Ford wrote:


After all the years of FUD surrounding DNSSEC deployment, I feel quite strongly that having the IETF do as you suggested and then be able to point to 'no discernible impact' on the network would be a significant milestone.


Data point: IETF65 (Dallas) had a DNSSEC enabled recursive nameserver (and, if I recall well, signed reverse zones). No impact noticed whatsoever. I wonder how many people actually knew.


--Olaf

Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]