Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impactto applicationdevelopers

[Fred Baker <fred@xxxxxxxxx>]

you might take a look at he nat66 document and the behave IPv4/IPv6  
documents. they're pretty different.

On Dec 1, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:

> Of course, Iljitsch points an interesting issue. If NAT66 behaves  
> exactly like, say, NAT 64, then why would the organization bother to  
> use IPv6 rather than sticking with net 10?

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf