Re: FTP to HISTORIC? RE: [BEHAVE] Can we have on NAT66 discussion?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 08:43 14-11-2008, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
I propose that we either move FTP to historic or start a revision effort if there is sufficient interest in continuing it as a separate protocol from HTTP.

There are a few I-D about FTP that have been submitted:

FTP Extension Registry
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin-ftp-registry-00.txt

FTP Extension for Internationalized Text
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-klensin-ftp-typeu-00.txt

Streamlined FTP Command Extensions
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-peterson-streamlined-ftp-command-extensions-06.txt

FTP EXTENSION ALLOWING IP FORWARDING (NATs)
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rosenau-ftp-single-port-05.txt

There were some discussion about one of the above I-Ds in Dublin.

Regards,
-sm

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]