Re: [BEHAVE] Handwaving? [Re: where to have the NAT66 discussion (was Re: Please move this thread to BEHAVE mailing list ... )]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Excerpts from Iljitsch van Beijnum on Tue, Dec 02, 2008 11:57:07AM +0100:
> On 2 dec 2008, at 5:37, Keith Moore wrote:
>
>> I don't think it's just that the multi-prefix model is unfamiliar.
>> There's plenty of reason to believe that it won't work well. Static
>> address selection rules, no way for hosts to know which prefixes will
>> work better, inability of most existing transport protocols to fail  
>> over
>> to alternate addresses.
>
> One way to fix that would be multipath transport protocols. Rather than 
> try to guess what works best, just use all of them (or at least several) 
> and get better performance without having to make difficult choices.

This doesn't help with site renumbering problems, just endpoint
renumbering.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]