On Mon, 1 Dec 2008 22:41:37 -0800 Christian Huitema <huitema@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Actually, rather than tunneling, have we seriously consider flat host > based routing in a corporate network? A combination of DHT and > caching technologies ought to make that quite scalable. I've used large, flat networks, and lived to regret it.... > > > > Of course, Iljitsch points an interesting issue. If NAT66 behaves > > > exactly like, say, NAT 64, then why would the organization bother > > > to use IPv6 rather than sticking with net 10? > > > > Services like Microsoft DirectAccess? > > Direct Access certainly does not require that enterprises deploy > NAT66... > No, but it requires v6 internally. --Steve Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf