Re: [BEHAVE] Lack of need for 66nat : Long term impact to application developers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



    > From: David Conrad <drc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

    > The architecture is _ALREADY_ broken. 66NAT is merely another symptom
    > of the underlying disease.

Hey, that's what happens when you pick as 'the next generation of networking',
"X.25 with a larger sequence number space" (or, for you youngsters who don't
remember X.25, "ATM with a larger cell size").

	Noel
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]