That reminds me of no-ip.com. name belong to them. typo belongs to a gangster. I used to have a workstation myname.typo with their dynamic dns. When a friend sent me an email to myname.typo a lot of peculiar things happened. I informed no-ip about that gangster abusing their name. That is when I lost my account. I did not know what happened until I sent a dig or a whois about typo to somebody else. I don't dare spelling that domain in an email again. That is all you need to get yourself on a blacklist. Kind regards Peter John Levine wrote: > Nothing personal, but you could hardly ask for a better > illustration. > > For one thing, this isn't a case of broken DNSBLs, it's a case of > getting what you asked for. > > Rather than using shared DNSBLs, this tiny host on a non-profit public > access network is desperately trying to run its own spam filters. > Maybe you sent him blowback from spam with forged addresses, maybe he > just mistyped someone else's address. Whatever it was, in the absence > of shared DNSBLs, the option isn't no filtering, it's a million local > filters on a million mail hosts with millions of mistakes that can > only be corrected one by one. At least this one was competent enough > to let you know that he'd rejected your mail. A lot of the million > mail admins aren't. > > For another, "I'm too important to block" is not a winning long term > response. We're all important in some areas and unimportant in > others. Spam sucks, spam filtering sucks, DNSBLs suck, but in a world > where >95% of all mail is spam, not filtering spam sucks way more, and > it even sucks way more than filtering with occasional mistakes. > > If, rather than trying to do his own filtering, this guy used some of > the popular reliable DNSBLs (none of which list 69.25.196.31) both he > and you would have avoided this screwup. > > Much though we might wish otherwise, spam and spam filtering aren't > going away, and by their nature, spam filters make errors. Anyone who > claims otherwise is way, way, out of touch. Some of us would rather > try to figure out ways to improve the delivery of real mail and > minimize the errors than rant about it. > > R's, > John > >> herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Delay reason: SMTP error from remote mailer after end of data: >> host rhun.apana.org.au [64.62.148.172]: 451-sender IP address >> 69.25.196.31 is locally blacklisted here. If you think >> 451 this is wrong, please call +61289874478. > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Peter and Karin Dambier Cesidian Root - Radice Cesidiana Rimbacher Strasse 16 D-69509 Moerlenbach-Bonsweiher +49(6209)795-816 (Telekom) +49(6252)750-308 (VoIP: sipgate.de) mail: peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.peter-dambier.de/ http://iason.site.voila.fr/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/iason/ ULA= fd80:4ce1:c66a::/48 _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf