In message <20081209070351.GC13153@xxxxxxx>, Theodore Tso writes: > On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 05:49:02PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > They didn't say why they had blacklisted that IP so there > > is no way to determine if it was a false positive or not. > > That also make the request to phone if the listing was in > > error pretty hard to determine. > > Well, it blocked a legitimate e-mail message, so by definition the > rejection was false positive. I've also checked a number of DNSBL's, > and no one else seems to have black-listed my IP address, except these > jokers. > > - Ted Define "legitimate". One that conforms to the RFC's? One that you send? One not containing advertising material? One that does not contain unsolicted advertising material? One about the content of the soil on the moon? One that doesn't discuss the content of the soil on the moon? The only one that can determine if it was a false positive or not is the person that added the entry. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf