On Nov 14, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
If we are documenting practice and nothing more, then the publication stream can move to informational and text can be added on why a new RR, which would normally be expected here, is not being used (essentially, inertia in the face of 15 years deployment). That may be a valuable use of an RFC; documenting the way things really work often is. But it shouldn't go onto the standards track, as there is a known technical deficiency.
Agreed. -Doug _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf