Re: SMTP+TLS to MXs, was Re: Comments on Draft IRTF ASRG DNSBL - 07

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <alpine.LSU.2.00.0811131135530.14367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony F
inch writes:
> You also need the server to provide a verifiable TLS certificate. The vast
> majority of them are not. This problem is perhaps even harder to fix than
> the lack of DNSSEC.

	Just use DNSSEC and CERT records to do that.

	If self signed, look in the DNS for the CERT.  Accept if
	signed and validated by DNSSEC.  Have a low TTL on the CERT
	so as to not blow the DNS cache (caches can enforce this
	if needed) and maintain a on disk cache of the certs retrieved
	via the DNS as they have their own validitiy period.  Attempt
	to retieve a new one via DNS of the on disk one doesn't
	match.

	Certs that are signed by private CAs are harder to deal
	with as you don't have the linkage from the name to the
	CA.

	Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]