David Morris wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Keith Moore wrote: > >> It would be really interesting to try to evaluate each of multi-prefix, >> map-and-encap, and map-and-translate according to (a) how much each >> approach affects applications and hosts in general, and (b) how >> deployable each approach is - where deployability has a lot to do with >> having the parties that benefit most (probably those that want to >> multihome) being the ones that bear the additional cost, and having the >> benefit be worth the cost. > > A key analysis point needs to be diagnostic support.. how hard any > individual approach will be to support is in my mind a significant part of > the deployability cost analysis. agreed. absolutely. and to address Brian's point from a few messages back that maybe this should be discussed in RRG instead of among the current set of recipients - does RRG have any established evaluation criteria like these, with which to compare potential solutions? if not, why not? Keith _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf