Fedora Packaging

• Thread Index

• Re: guayadeque pkgconfig question
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: guayadeque pkgconfig question
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• guayadeque pkgconfig question
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Strange gdm packaging
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Need help with the rpmbuild
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Need help with the rpmbuild
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Need help with the rpmbuild
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Strange gdm packaging
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Need help with the rpmbuild
  • From: Sankar Tanguturi
• Strange gdm packaging
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: David Malcolm
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: No -devel package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: No -devel package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Garrett Holmstrom
• Re: No -devel package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• policycoreutils-devel
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• No -devel package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
  • From: Chun Tat David Chu
• Re: Missing 'Provides:' from rpmdeps, apparently?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Missing 'Provides:' from rpmdeps, apparently?
  • From: John Pye
• Re: Missing 'Provides:' from rpmdeps, apparently?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
  • From: Greg Swift
• Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Missing 'Provides:' from rpmdeps, apparently?
  • From: John Pye
• Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
  • From: yersinia
• Creating a "super rpm" that installs other rpms
  • From: Fred White
• Re: parallel make
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: parallel make
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: Packaging webfonts
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: parallel make
  • From: Andy Grimm
• Re: parallel make
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: parallel make
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: parallel make
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Re: parallel make
  • From: Gianluca Sforna
• Re: parallel make
  • From: Dan Horák
• parallel make
  • From: Parag N(पराग़)
• Packaging webfonts
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Orphaning gksu-polkit
  • From: Mario Blättermann
• need review
  • From: philippe makowski
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: should packages be changed to use libexec?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• should packages be changed to use libexec?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [Bug 874105] New: Review Request: qpid-proton - Proton is a high performance, lightweight messaging library
  • From: Darryl L. Pierce
• Re: SPEC for multiple python versions
  • From: Garrett Holmstrom
• Re: is /etc/cron.*/* config file?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: is /etc/cron.*/* config file?
  • From: Tom Callaway
• SPEC for multiple python versions
  • From: Jakov Sosic
• is /etc/cron.*/* config file?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
  • From: Paolo Bonzini
• Fwd: [fpc] #229: New mpi module install location and content
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• PHP Guidelines - minor change
  • From: Remi Collet
• Multiple packages with the same base name versioning
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Self-hosting LLVM/Clang?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: [perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: [perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [perl-Coro] Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
  • From: Mario Blättermann
• Re: discussion around 'policy' for multiple versions of same software in EPEL
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Unbundling oscpack and boost libraries under review
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Unbundling oscpack and boost libraries under review
  • From: Brendan Jones
• discussion around 'policy' for multiple versions of same software in EPEL
  • From: Greg Swift
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Paolo Bonzini
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Paolo Bonzini
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Paolo Bonzini
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Paolo Bonzini
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Paolo Bonzini
• Re: Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Karsten Hopp
• Request for exception: seabios-bin on ppc64
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: RFD: C/C++ template packages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: RFD: C/C++ template packages
  • From: Paul Howarth
• RFD: C/C++ template packages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Rules for obsoleting or conflicting packages
  • From: Mario Blättermann
• Re: Dependence on initscripts/chkconfig
  • From: Miroslav Suchy
• Dependence on initscripts/chkconfig
  • From: Milan Broz
• Re: APT,YUM and package status
  • From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
• Re: APT,YUM and package status
  • From: George Machitidze
• Re: APT,YUM and package status
  • From: George Machitidze
• Re: APT,YUM and package status
  • From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
• [Guidelines Change] Change to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: APT,YUM and package status
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: APT,YUM and package status
  • From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
• Re: APT,YUM and package status
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: APT,YUM and package status
  • From: Christopher Meng
• APT,YUM and package status
  • From: Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh
• Re: Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• mp3 source (but not compiled) in squeak package
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: requiring a (non-specific) font?
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• requiring a (non-specific) font?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• change to icon scriptlets to use -f flag seems wrong
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Error with desktop-file-install
  • From: Truong Anh. Tuan
• Re: Error with desktop-file-install
  • From: Björn Persson
• Error with desktop-file-install
  • From: Truong Anh. Tuan
• Exceptions for packages placing files into /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64
  • From: Jaroslav Skarvada
• Re: Using upstream unusual package name
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Using upstream unusual package name
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Using upstream unusual package name
  • From: Shakthi Kannan
• Re: Using upstream unusual package name
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Using upstream unusual package name
  • From: Shakthi Kannan
• Re: Using upstream unusual package name
  • From: Truong Anh. Tuan
• Using upstream unusual package name
  • From: Shakthi Kannan
• Re: guayadeque package review and bundled files
  • From: Brendan Jones
• package naming -- axis2 version 1.4
  • From: Andy Grimm
• guayadeque package review and bundled files
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: version-release for different branches
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: version-release for different branches
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: version-release for different branches
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: version-release for different branches
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: version-release for different branches
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: version-release for different branches
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: version-release for different branches
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: version-release for different branches
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• version-release for different branches
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
  • From: Fernando Nasser
• Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Should {NEWS, CHANGELOG, README, etc} go into main package or -doc subpackage?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: indent man
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: indent man
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: indent man
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Bug 821631] Gnome icon theme not needed in minimal installation
  • From: Caterpillar
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: indent man
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: php/php53 application packaging
  • From: indent man
• php/php53 application packaging
  • From: indent man
• Re: When to use a leading underscore?
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: When to use a leading underscore?
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: When to use a leading underscore?
  • From: indent man
• Re: When to use a leading underscore?
  • From: indent man
• Re: [Bug 821631] Gnome icon theme not needed in minimal installation
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• [Bug 821631] Gnome icon theme not needed in minimal installation
  • From: Caterpillar
• When to use a leading underscore?
  • From: Björn Persson
• anybody working on smuxi?
  • From: Adrian Alves
• Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Provides for unversioned so files
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Provides for unversioned so files
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Provides for unversioned so files
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Provides for unversioned so files
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Provides for unversioned so files
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Provides for unversioned so files
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Other people modifying specfiles...
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Other people modifying specfiles...
  • From: Darryl L. Pierce
• Re: Build dependencies
  • From: indent man
• Re: Build dependencies
  • From: Remi Collet
• Build dependencies
  • From: Sébastien Nicouleaud
• Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: Location of LICENSE and README file
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Location of LICENSE and README file
  • From: Miroslav Suchy
• Re: packaging an axis2-based service
  • From: Andy Grimm
• Re: packaging an axis2-based service
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: packaging an axis2-based service
  • From: Andy Grimm
• Re: packaging an axis2-based service
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• packaging an axis2-based service
  • From: Andy Grimm
• Re: Contributing to a checkinstall package for Fedora releases
  • From: Declan McGrath
• Re: Contributing to a checkinstall package for Fedora releases
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Contributing to a checkinstall package for Fedora releases
  • From: Declan McGrath
• Re: versioning question for stax-utils
  • From: Andy Grimm
• Re: Is this a bug or not?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Is this a bug or not?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: versioning question for stax-utils
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• versioning question for stax-utils
  • From: Andy Grimm
• Re: Is this a bug or not?
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: Is this a bug or not?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Is this a bug or not?
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• [Guidelines Change] Change to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
  • From: Tom Lane
• May binaries be built from generated "source" code?
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: refuse an upgrade?
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: refuse an upgrade?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: .desktop file - desktop-file-install - recent changes ?
  • From: David Timms
• refuse an upgrade?
  • From: Paul Wouters
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Cole Robinson
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Distributing prebuilt bios roms with QEMU
  • From: Cole Robinson
• Re: .desktop file - desktop-file-install - recent changes ?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• .desktop file - desktop-file-install - recent changes ?
  • From: David Timms
• Re: packaging Digest, Vol 89, Issue 10
  • From: benedikt
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: clarification: python2 modules allowed to go into python2-foo?
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: clarification: python2 modules allowed to go into python2-foo?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• clarification: python2 modules allowed to go into python2-foo?
  • From: Thomas Spura
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Marcela Mašláňová
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Script-Tools, which location?
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: Script-Tools, which location?
  • From: Simon A. Erat
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Darryl L. Pierce
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: Script-Tools, which location?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: revision of Haskell Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Script-Tools, which location?
  • From: Simon A. Erat
• Re: Obsoletes and Provides
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Obsoletes and Provides
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Obsoletes and Provides
  • From: Emmanuel Seyman
• Re: Where to install LD_PRELOAD libraries
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Where to install LD_PRELOAD libraries
  • From: Niels de Vos
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: RPM macros
  • From: Paul Howarth
• RPM macros
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• revision of Haskell Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jens Petersen
• Re: Using Cmake in a package...
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Where to install LD_PRELOAD libraries
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Using Cmake in a package...
  • From: Darryl Pierce
• Building the freemedforms suite
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Adjust old ruby guidelines to new ruby guidelines
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• OT: Re: Where Can I Find Previous Versions?
  • From: Frank Murphy
• Where Can I Find Previous Versions?
  • From: Joseph D. Wagner
• Re: Python compiled files without .py in a name
  • From: Mads Kiilerich
• Python compiled files without .py in a name
  • From: Martin Krizek
• Adjust old ruby guidelines to new ruby guidelines
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
  • From: Simone Caronni
• Re: Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
  • From: Robyn Bergeron
• Questions about feature "Systemd unit cleanup and enhancement"
  • From: Simone Caronni
• Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
  • From: Remi
• Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
  • From: Joe Orton
• Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: PHP library must not requires Apache
  • From: Tom Callaway
• PHP library must not requires Apache
  • From: Remi Collet
• Re: imapsync packaging in fedora
  • From: Tom Callaway
• imapsync packaging in fedora
  • From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Incorrect suggestion in sysvinit packaging guide?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Incorrect suggestion in sysvinit packaging guide?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Need advice on using a new directory in the root hierarchy
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: root of a repository
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: root of a repository
  • From: Garrett Holmstrom
• scriptlets
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Adding subpackage == new review?
  • From: Thomas Spura
• Re: Adding subpackage == new review?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Adding subpackage == new review?
  • From: Jan Kaluža
• Re: Self Introduction
  • From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
• root of a repository
  • From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
• Re: Can multiple packages built from same source?
  • From: Lin Gao
• Re: Can multiple packages built from same source?
  • From: Lin Gao
• Re: Can multiple packages built from same source?
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: Can multiple packages built from same source?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Can multiple packages built from same source?
  • From: Lin Gao
• Self Introduction
  • From: Lin Gao
• Re: GNULib exception link on FPC trac
  • From: Praveen Kumar
• Re: GNULib exception link on FPC trac
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• GNULib exception link on FPC trac
  • From: Praveen Kumar
• Re: opensmtpd - http://www.opensmtpd.org/
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: opensmtpd - http://www.opensmtpd.org/
  • From: Adrian Alves
• Re: Single review request for multiple packages
  • From: Simone Caronni
• Re: detailed descriptions of the categories?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: opensmtpd - http://www.opensmtpd.org/
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• package: shrinkwrap-descriptors and arquillian
  • From: Lin Gao
• opensmtpd - http://www.opensmtpd.org/
  • From: Adrian Alves
• Re: grive open source client for google drive
  • From: Christopher Meng
• Re: Moving an existing rpmfusion package into Fedora
  • From: Jonathan Dieter
• Re: Moving an existing rpmfusion package into Fedora
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: Moving an existing rpmfusion package into Fedora
  • From: Jonathan Dieter
• Re: Moving an existing rpmfusion package into Fedora
  • From: Brendan Jones
• gnome-shell-extension-updater for fedora
  • From: Adrian Alves
• grive open source client for google drive
  • From: Adrian Alves
• detailed descriptions of the categories?
  • From: Christopher Howard
• Re: Moving an existing rpmfusion package into Fedora
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: what do u think about package this owncloud
  • From: Marc Deop i Argemí
• Re: Moving an existing rpmfusion package into Fedora
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: what do u think about package this owncloud
  • From: zxq9
• Re: what do u think about package this owncloud
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: what do u think about package this owncloud
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: what do u think about package this owncloud
  • From: Marc Deop i Argemí
• Re: what do u think about package this owncloud
  • From: Adrian Alves
• Re: what do u think about package this owncloud
  • From: Robyn Bergeron
• Re: what do u think about package this owncloud
  • From: Rex Dieter
• what do u think about package this owncloud
  • From: Adrian Alves
• Moving an existing rpmfusion package into Fedora
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: uninstall an rpm and related files
  • From: John Dennis
• Re: uninstall an rpm and related files
  • From: Rex Dieter
• uninstall an rpm and related files
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Manpages using %doc
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Manpages using %doc
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Manpages using %doc
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Manpages using %doc
  • From: Tomas Radej
• Re: Single review request for multiple packages
  • From: Simone Caronni
• Re: Single review request for multiple packages
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: Single review request for multiple packages
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Single review request for multiple packages
  • From: Simone Caronni
• Re: Single review request for multiple packages
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Single review request for multiple packages
  • From: Simone Caronni
• Re: Single review request for multiple packages
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Single review request for multiple packages
  • From: Simone Caronni
• Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-05-09
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: recursively adding files/folders in %files
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: recursively adding files/folders in %files
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Re: recursively adding files/folders in %files
  • From: Rex Dieter
• recursively adding files/folders in %files
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: packaging a library
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: packaging a library
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• packaging a library
  • From: Christopher Howard
• Re: use of %verifyscript
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: use of %verifyscript
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: use of %verifyscript
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• use of %verifyscript
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Reusing the same git module for different compat versions?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Reusing the same git module for different compat versions?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: Reusing the same git module for different compat versions?
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Reusing the same git module for different compat versions?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: packaging python applications
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: packaging python applications
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: packaging python applications
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: packaging python applications
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: packaging python applications
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• packaging python applications
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Can rpmbuild resolve these 4 issues ?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Can rpmbuild resolve these 4 issues ?
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: BuildError: mismatch when analyzing $PACKAGE
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Can rpmbuild resolve these 4 issues ?
  • From: Jindrich Novy
• Re: Can rpmbuild resolve these 4 issues ?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Can rpmbuild resolve these 4 issues ?
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Running installation shell script
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Running installation shell script
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: BuildError: mismatch when analyzing $PACKAGE
  • From: Darryl L. Pierce
• Re: BuildError: mismatch when analyzing $PACKAGE
  • From: Rex Dieter
• BuildError: mismatch when analyzing $PACKAGE
  • From: Darryl L. Pierce
• Re: Running installation shell script
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Running installation shell script
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Thomas Spura
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: should I include tests in the package?
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• should I include tests in the package?
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: Extending the Static Library Packaging Guidelines to cover inline/template code
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Extending the Static Library Packaging Guidelines to cover inline/template code
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Extending the Static Library Packaging Guidelines to cover inline/template code
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Extending the Static Library Packaging Guidelines to cover inline/template code
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Extending the Static Library Packaging Guidelines to cover inline/template code
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Extending the Static Library Packaging Guidelines to cover inline/template code
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Extending the Static Library Packaging Guidelines to cover inline/template code
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: run "make" in the %build section
  • From: Brendan Jones
• run "make" in the %build section
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: signing
  • From: Paul Morgan
• signing
  • From: Christopher Howard
• Re: %post script run as root
  • From: Rex Dieter
• %post script run as root
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: games packages / manual installation
  • From: Buddhike Kurera
• Re: games packages / manual installation
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• games packages / manual installation
  • From: Christopher Howard
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-04-18
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-04-18
  • From: Björn Persson
• Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-04-18
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Mario Blättermann
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Nelson Manuel Marques
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: RPM Packaging Help
  • From: Praveen Kumar
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Matthias Runge
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Christopher Meng
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: what a buildroot is
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• what a buildroot is
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
  • From: Michal Ambroz
• Re: error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: GSOC : implementation of the survey infrastructure
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jeroen van Meeuwen
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Jeroen van Meeuwen
• Re: GSOC : implementation of the survey infrastructure
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: RPM Packaging Help
  • From: Christopher Meng
• RPM Packaging Help
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• error: Package already exists: %package debuginfo
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: find: /var/tmp/pcore-0.1-Beta-root: No such file or directory
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: find: /var/tmp/pcore-0.1-Beta-root: No such file or directory
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: find: /var/tmp/pcore-0.1-Beta-root: No such file or directory
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• find: /var/tmp/pcore-0.1-Beta-root: No such file or directory
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: %prep
  • From: Christopher Meng
• emacs geben mode, even an old src.rpm
  • From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: zxq9
• Re: Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Cannot cd to %{name}-%{version}
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: %prep
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Re: %prep
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• %prep
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Basic Questions
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Filtering requires
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: Give errors when tring to build rpm environment
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: Give errors when tring to build rpm environment
  • From: Rich Mattes
• Re: Basic Questions
  • From: "Germán A. Racca"
• Re: Give errors when tring to build rpm environment
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: Give errors when tring to build rpm environment
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Give errors when tring to build rpm environment
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: Basic Questions
  • From: Christopher Meng
• Re: Basic Questions
  • From: Mihamina Rakotomandimby
• Re: Give errors when tring to build rpm environment
  • From: Christopher Meng
• Give errors when tring to build rpm environment
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: Basic Questions
  • From: Christopher Meng
• Basic Questions
  • From: Kamal Ahmed
• Re: Filtering requires
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Filtering requires
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: Filtering requires
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: Filtering requires
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Filtering requires
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: Filtering requires
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting - 2012-04-11
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Filtering requires
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: Filtering requires
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Filtering requires
  • From: Brendan Jones
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Shakthi Kannan
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Praveen Kumar
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Praveen Kumar
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Praveen Kumar
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Praveen Kumar
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Christopher Meng
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Jochen Schmitt
• Re: How do Packaging
  • From: Truong Anh. Tuan
• How do Packaging
  • From: Srineth Priyanka
• Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
  • From: Thomas Spura
• Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
  • From: Russell Golden
• Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
  • From: Russell Golden
• Re: EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• EPEL packaging question - mozilla-adblockplus
  • From: Russell Golden
• Re: Ruby guidelines draft - further discussion
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Ruby guidelines draft - further discussion
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Re: Ruby guidelines draft - further discussion
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Ruby guidelines draft - further discussion
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Re: alternatives --force (removing an old init script)
  • From: Ricardo Rocha
• Re: alternatives --force (removing an old init script)
  • From: Rex Dieter
• alternatives --force (removing an old init script)
  • From: Ricardo Rocha
• Re: Ruby interpreter independence needs more work
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Ruby interpreter independence needs more work
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Summer coding idea
  • From: Buddhike Kurera
• Ada guidelines changes
  • From: Björn Persson
• Re: RPM doesn't conflict
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Re: Installing GConf schemas
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• GSoC 2012 ideas - support expanding the list
  • From: Buddhika Kurera
• New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Marcela Mašláňová
• Installing GConf schemas
  • From: Vinzenz Vietzke
• Re: RPM doesn't conflict
  • From: Tom Callaway
• RPM doesn't conflict
  • From: Nelson Manuel Marques
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Re: Icon tag in spec files
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Icon tag in spec files
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Re: Icon tag in spec files
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Icon tag in spec files
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Packaging legacy sysv initscripts and native systemd unit
  • From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Fedora Packaging Committee Meeting Minutes/Log from 2012-02-29
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Mo Morsi
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Emanuel Rietveld
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Jon Ciesla
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• New packaging guidelines for Ruby
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• How to download LSB DB Tools ?
  • From: R P Herrold
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• How to download LSB DB Tools ?
  • From: Xibo Ning
• Re: Systemd conversion trigger question
  • From: Jamie Nguyen
• Re: Systemd conversion trigger question
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Systemd conversion trigger question
  • From: Jamie Nguyen
• Re: Systemd conversion trigger question
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Systemd conversion trigger question
  • From: Jamie Nguyen
• Systemd conversion trigger question
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Jon Masters
• Guideline change request: make PIE 'must' instead of 'should'
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Re: Packaging guidelines - mandatory rebuilding gems
  • From: Bohuslav Kabrda
• Re: Time for Lua packaging guidelines?
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Time for Lua packaging guidelines?
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Paul Howarth
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Packaging guidelines - mandatory rebuilding gems
  • From: Mo Morsi
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Tom Lane
• Re: Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Bill Nottingham
• Scripting language dependencies
  • From: Jon Masters
• Re: Packaging guidelines - mandatory rebuilding gems
  • From: Toshio Kuratomi
• Re: Error: Package: alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16.x86_64 (updates) Requires: alsa-lib >= 1.0.25
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Error: Package: alsa-utils-1.0.25-7.fc16.x86_64 (updates) Requires: alsa-lib >= 1.0.25
  • From: Christopher Meng