Panu Matilainen wrote: > A name is just a name, there's no functional difference. Once upon a > time in a faraway galaxy there might have been, but that's nothing you > need to worry about. These days its just a naming convention, albeit a > rather blurry one. > > The bottom line: as long as your macros are "namespaced" (such as your > GNAT/_GNAT prefix) to limit the possibility of clashes with others, > you're technically free to call them whatever you want. Following > existing conventions is not a bad idea though. OK, one problem less to worry about. Thanks! Björn Persson -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
