Re: Using upstream unusual package name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/25/2012 09:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:42:23PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
Hi,

--- On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Truong Anh. Tuan
<tuanta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
| Please read Naming Guidelines [1] carefully.
| As you see, "star" (*) character is not allowed in Fedora package name.
\--

I had referred to:

   http://hackage.haskell.org/package/brainfuck

Ah... so you're actually refering to the obscenity in the package name?
That's a good question.  We generally want to keep things "family friendly"
but in this case both the program and the programming language it implements
have that name.  I'd lean towards allowing it but you might want to open
a ticket here and the full FPC can consider it:

So do I. It's how its parents have named their child. We may like it or not, nevertheless, Fedora should react as grown-ups and respect their choice, unless the name would be illegal in juristictions applicable to Fedora.

That said, I can only guess on the reasons for their choice, probably they haven't quite quit puberty and "find it cool" or they mean their choice as some sort of provocation/attention-teaser.

The later would mean, if Fedora is taking special means, Fedora went into the trap they set up. - IMO, they should be treated with the amount of attention they deserve: An arbitrary package amongst 1000s of others ;)

Ralf




--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux