On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok, thanks, I will do it this way, then. Additionally, if there is a dependency chain for the packages, for building, runtime, or anything, have the BZs block each other appropriately so it's easier to see which one(s) someone should try to review first, second, third, etc. -J > Regards, > --Simone > > On 10 May 2012 10:32, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 05/10/2012 09:35 AM, Simone Caronni wrote: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have one question. I would like to submit a review request for >>> Guacamole, an HTML5 vnc and rdp client. >>> >>> The software itself is already packaged in separate small libraries and >>> tools for Fedora: >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/guacamole/files/current/source/ >>> http://guac-dev.org/Fedora%20Install%20Instructions >>> >>> Since all the pieces taken alone are quite useless, should I fill a >>> review request for all the packages in one singular review or should I >>> fill multiple reviews requests, one for each piece? >> >> >> The latter (one package after the other). >> >> Admitted, this will take time, but one single review for many packages is >> close to being unmanagable. >> >> Ralf >> > > > > -- > You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of > the shore (R. W. Emerson). > > > -- > packaging mailing list > packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
