Re: Provides for unversioned so files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/22/2012 09:09 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
"SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

SO> I came upon this when runnning fedora-review on this package. Now I
SO> am wondering: Is this a packaging problem in bind-dyndb-ldap
SO> (i.e. it has provides for private shared unversioned library) or is
SO> it OK? The so file is outside ldpath so that's not an issue.

I would definitely filter it

Or get rpm to autoprov only on ldpath'd items...

-- rex
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux