>>>>> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: SO> I came upon this when runnning fedora-review on this package. Now I SO> am wondering: Is this a packaging problem in bind-dyndb-ldap SO> (i.e. it has provides for private shared unversioned library) or is SO> it OK? The so file is outside ldpath so that's not an issue. I would definitely filter it if building for a release new enough to have the filtering setup that can handle archful packages (which at this point is any Fedora release). These still haven't made it into any guidelines, though. At least there's now some documentation at http://rpm.org/wiki/PackagerDocs/DependencyGenerator - J< -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
