[a mail each day keeps the doctor away] Copying from bugzilla for public consumption. Package submissions, where even the src.rpm has been given a -devel Name: * inih-devel and uthash-devel Review Requests off the top of my head. Preferably, the package submitters would tell which sections of the guidelines have lead to this. And there's a risk that a reviewer doesn't disagree. [...] Counter-examples _in_ the package collection, which have not been treated like a compiler package: * libkdtree++ builds a library-less libkdtree++-devel package. Noarch, too. * eigen3, eigen2 are also C++ Template "Libraries", which build a library-less noarch -devel package. * glm builds a library-less -devel package. Not noarch, however. -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
