Re: purpose of ruby(abi), python(abi), etc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:34:52AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> 
> Both of these binary formats are guaranteed to be consistent within a
> minor release (such as "2.7" or "3.3").  They don't change with the
> microrelease (2.7.3) or with the rpm version ("2.7-1").
> 
Does python make any promises about other changes within a minor release?
For instance, changes to the language itself or changes to the stdlib API?
I know that I've seen changes rejected for a minor release series upstream
because they introduced those types of changes but I'm not sure how strict
that is and what it covers?

-Toshio

Attachment: pgp9DNkW0kpNv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux