Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:03:30AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >I've thought of one technical thing that is lost if we allow this but it
> >may not be that important.  Currently a sysadmin could install packages
> >on an x86 and then mount the /usr/lib directory on both x86 and x86_64
> >systems.
> We already allow folks to use /usr/lib/%{name} and %_libexecdir
> interchangeably (don't we?), 

I think that's the question at hand, actually.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux