Quoting Tom Lane (2012-09-11 19:27:08) > Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > What some people don't like is that F16/17 git history will contain > > mention of F18 mass rebuild, but that is (again IMO) a very minor > > "issue". > > FWIW, I beg to differ. There is no problem at all if you skip over > release number 3 in some branch, but having a specfile changelog that > lies about what happened in that branch is a bad idea. It'll lead to > confusion later. If the commit was anything else than raising release tag and adding a changelog entry I'd completely agree. As originally stated, I am aware of opinions like yours and even if I don't agree...it's up to maintainer to decide in the end (unless one of us brings the issue in front of FPC/FESCO :-) ). -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
