Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > What some people don't like is that F16/17 git history will contain > mention of F18 mass rebuild, but that is (again IMO) a very minor > "issue". FWIW, I beg to differ. There is no problem at all if you skip over release number 3 in some branch, but having a specfile changelog that lies about what happened in that branch is a bad idea. It'll lead to confusion later. regards, tom lane -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
