Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:40:28AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >>We already allow folks to use /usr/lib/%{name} and %_libexecdir
> >>interchangeably (don't we?),
> >I think that's the question at hand, actually.
> See
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Libexecdir
> not exactly 100% interchangeable ... but already does allow
> /usr/lib/... in the cases where libexecdir isn't directly supported

Nope -- it allows %{_libdir}, which on 64-bit is /usr/lib64. You're not
supposed to put 64-bit binaries under /usr/lib/%{name}.

-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux