Re: How important is %{_libdir} to arch-specific but non-multilib packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/15/2012 10:40 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
On 11/15/2012 10:20 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 10:03:30AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
I've thought of one technical thing that is lost if we allow this
but it
may not be that important.  Currently a sysadmin could install packages
on an x86 and then mount the /usr/lib directory on both x86 and x86_64
systems.
We already allow folks to use /usr/lib/%{name} and %_libexecdir
interchangeably (don't we?),

I think that's the question at hand, actually.

See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Libexecdir


not exactly 100% interchangeable ... but already does allow /usr/lib/...
in the cases where libexecdir isn't directly supported

oh, I totally misread that, *nevermind*. the guideline says %{_libdir}/%{name}

-- rex

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux