On 10/22/2012 10:06 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/22/2012 03:47 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
commit e00f8293097f8331883f1df35f74be70fbb290b9
Author: Petr Písař <ppisar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Oct 22 15:46:27 2012 +0200
Work-aroung missing libecb package on build-triggering host
perl-Coro.spec | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Coro.spec b/perl-Coro.spec
index 50a855d..31589a5 100644
--- a/perl-Coro.spec
+++ b/perl-Coro.spec
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Requires: perl(EV) >= 3
Requires: perl(Event) >= 1.08
Requires: perl(Guard) >= 0.5
Requires: perl(Storable) >= 2.15
-Provides: bundled(libecb) = %(rpm -q libecb --qf '%{VERSION}')
+Provides: bundled(libecb)%(rpm -q libecb --qf ' = %{VERSION}'
2>/dev/null)
I could be wrong, but IIRC, calling rpm inside of rpm specs is not
allowed in Fedora.
Apart of this, what you are doing is rendering your built
non-deterministic - Another "strictly forbidden" item.
Agreed. What you're trying to say essentially is that the bundled
libecb version matches the system/non-bundled version, which really
doesn't make any sense. I'd suggest you simply remove the versioning
(or list the real bundled version some other way).
-- rex
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging