Hi Ahmed
you probably want:
%install
install -D -m 755 obj/ggsnc/ggsnc $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/
%files
%{_bindir}/ggsnc
Best regards
Michal Ambroz
< ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
< Od: Kamal Ahmed <kamal2222ahmed@xxxxxxxxx>
< Předmět: Re: error: Package already exists: %package
< debuginfo
< Datum: 15.4.2012 22:56:13
< ----------------------------------------
< I have looked everywhere and still cannot find any example of SPEC which
< installs the binary files created as a result of Make.
< ( if the Makefile is missing the install section )
<
<
< so here is what i have from a tutorial.
<
< Name: foo ... BuildRoot: /tmp/%{name} %prep ... %build ... %install install
< -m755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/obj/ggsnc/ggsnc %{_bindir}/ %files /usr/bin/ggsnc
<
< but i get error:
<
< + umask 022
< + cd /home/kahmed/rpmbuild/BUILD
< + cd pcore
< + LANG=C
< + export LANG
< + unset DISPLAY
< + install -m755 /tmp/pcore/obj/ggsnc/ggsnc /usr/bin/
< install: cannot stat `/tmp/pcore/obj/ggsnc/ggsnc': No such file or directory
< error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.93457 (%install)
<
<
< now ALL i want to do is to copy
< /home/kahmed/rpmbuild/BUILD/pcore/obj/ggsnc/ggsnc to /usr/bin
< in a root simulated environment.
<
< Now all the examples i am looking at use makefile install, or automake, so i
< cannot reverse engineer.
<
< Thanks,
< -Kamal.
<
<
< >________________________________
< > From: Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx>
< >To: packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
< >Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 6:45 AM
< >Subject: Re: error: Package already exists: %package
< debuginfo
< >
< >On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:47:33 -0700 (PDT), KA (Kamal) wrote:
< >
< >> ok removed the macro from .rpmmacros
< >>
< >> i think the error was because i had comment
< >>
< >> #This ...
< >> in the %install section
< >>
< >> since i did NOT have any
< >>
< >> %package debuginfo
< >>
< >> hence i deduce that
< >
< >A comment within the %install section does not cause an error like that,
< >but be careful with RPM macros in comments. They are expanded, too, and
< >can lead to unexpected results/errors.
< >
< >A full .spec file is easier to review than just an error message without
< >any context. ;-)
< >--
< >packaging mailing list
< >packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
< >https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
< >
< >
<
<
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
