Hello list, could we start with the discussion about the packaging guidelines for Ruby once again? The discussion is very long and I guess everyone is now lost in too many details. I'd like to propose going over the whole guidelines, from a paragraph to a paragraph, so it is clear what is okay and what is not and why. >From previous emails it looks like the discussion stalled and arguments are only repeated over and over. I believe whole Ruby SIG agreed on the guidelines. Would it help if more people from SIG participate in this debate? Or would it be more specific examples helpful? Ruby is not like Perl or Python. It has its own specific ways. Upstreams are usually not happy, when distribution change those specifics too much. Some packages are hard to package into rpm and we need to do some hacks around, which bring more comfort to packagers. Please take a break for few days in this discussion and start again. Regards, Marcela -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
