Dne 27.6.2012 15:07, Till Maas napsal(a):
Hi,
I noticed that the old ruby guidelines[0] and the new ruby guidelines[1]
use different macro names, for example gemname and gem_name. Since the
old guidelines need to be used for several years in EPEL, I propose to
adjust the old guidelines to the new guidlines as much as possible:
- use consistent macro names
- define macros provided in rubygems-devel in F17+ in spec files
according to the old guidelines
Are there any general objections? Otherwise I will prepare a Packaging
Draft with above changes.
Regards
Till
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Old_Ruby
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Hi Till,
I am not completely sure what should be actual result of the changes, so
I am going to throw in just a few notes:
* The macro names for packaging rubygems, which are used in F17, could
be used in all Fedoras, since they were backported into the previous
releases.
* I'd love to see them also in RHEL [1], but that is not up to me
unfortunately.
* On one hand, I'd love to see the old guidelines more aligned with the
current guidelines, but I am afraid we cannot avoid confusion, so I am
not sure that the change is worth of it.
Vit
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=788001
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
