Re: New packaging guidelines for Ruby

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 10:13 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>
>> Dne 28.2.2012 16:59, Rex Dieter napsal(a):
>>>
>>> On 02/28/2012 09:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pleas do not be mistaken. We are not speaking about building gems from
>>>> sources.
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, so... is there some other better way to do it then? Please do
>>> suggest any better alternative if you do.
>>
>>
>> Better way is not doing it.
>
>
> I guess we may have to agree to disagree then.  Guidelines that allow for
> not building from (preferred form) source is deal-breaker for me at least.

Agreed.  We have to rebuild Java jars, or not include them, no matter
how uncomfortable COUGH*gallery2*COUGH.  I don't see why another
language should be any different.

-J

> -- rex
> --
> packaging mailing list
> packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



-- 
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux