On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 06:23:44PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/14/2012 07:36 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> >
> >Personally, the more i think about it, the more it feels right and makes
> >sense to allow this. In essence, one can consider non-multilib'd
> >%_prefix/lib and %_libexecdir content to be equal policy-wise.
>
> I do not agree. %_libexecdir is policy-wise similar to %_bindir (non
> multilib'ed).
>
True but -- we already allow %{_libdir}/UNIQUENAME as a standin for
%{_libexecdir}/UNIQUENAME even though what goes there is non-multilib'd. So
it doesn't seem harmful to allow %{_prefix}/lib as an alternate for the
non-multilib'd case as well.
-Toshio
Attachment:
pgpV4Usw3TSth.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
